Home
Fracture Feminism: The Politics of Impossible Time British Romanticism
Barnes and Noble
Fracture Feminism: The Politics of Impossible Time British Romanticism
Current price: $99.00
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5bcc/e5bccb25a6f2d16c87f58163c0c6e71ce2ee3523" alt="Fracture Feminism: The Politics of Impossible Time British Romanticism"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5bcc/e5bccb25a6f2d16c87f58163c0c6e71ce2ee3523" alt="Fracture Feminism: The Politics of Impossible Time British Romanticism"
Barnes and Noble
Fracture Feminism: The Politics of Impossible Time British Romanticism
Current price: $99.00
Size: Hardcover
Loading Inventory...
*Product information may vary - to confirm product availability, pricing, shipping and return information please contact Barnes and Noble
Feminist writers in British Romanticism often developed alternatives to linear time. Viewing time as a system of social control, writers like Mary Wollstonecraft, Anna Barbauld, and Mary Shelley wrote about current events as if they possessed knowledge from the future.
Fracture Feminism
explores this tradition with a perspective informed by Lacanian psychoanalysis and Derridean deconstruction, showing how time can be imagined to contain a hidden fracture—and how that fracture, when claimed as a point of view, could be the basis for an emancipatory politics. Arguing that the period's most radical experiments in undoing time stemmed from the era's discourses of gender and women's rights,
asks: to what extent could women "belong" to their historical moment, given their political and social marginalization? How would voices from the future interrupt the ordinary procedures of political debate? What if utopia were understood as a time rather than a place, and its time were already inside the present?
Fracture Feminism
explores this tradition with a perspective informed by Lacanian psychoanalysis and Derridean deconstruction, showing how time can be imagined to contain a hidden fracture—and how that fracture, when claimed as a point of view, could be the basis for an emancipatory politics. Arguing that the period's most radical experiments in undoing time stemmed from the era's discourses of gender and women's rights,
asks: to what extent could women "belong" to their historical moment, given their political and social marginalization? How would voices from the future interrupt the ordinary procedures of political debate? What if utopia were understood as a time rather than a place, and its time were already inside the present?