Home
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan Forty Years Later: Retrospective, Perspective, Prospective:a Special Issue of communication Law and Policy
Barnes and Noble
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan Forty Years Later: Retrospective, Perspective, Prospective:a Special Issue of communication Law and Policy
Current price: $240.00
Barnes and Noble
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan Forty Years Later: Retrospective, Perspective, Prospective:a Special Issue of communication Law and Policy
Current price: $240.00
Size: Hardcover
Loading Inventory...
*Product information may vary - to confirm product availability, pricing, shipping and return information please contact Barnes and Noble
The need to protect free speech on matters of governing importance--more than any other element of government--is the defining factor of a free society. Nowhere in the law is that prospect more clearly explained than in the opinion in
Times v. Sullivan.
This special issue provides an example of the breadth and scope of
Times v. Sullivan
and the ways in which the case continues to impact the jurisprudence of free expression. It is introduced by two essays designed to provide an overview of the case, providing insights into the origins of the dispute the Court was called upon to settle. The next four articles are testimony to breadth the opinion in this case, particularly dealing with aspects not often considered. Combined, they all demonstrate the lasting significance of what may be the most important free expression case the Court has delivered.
Times v. Sullivan.
This special issue provides an example of the breadth and scope of
Times v. Sullivan
and the ways in which the case continues to impact the jurisprudence of free expression. It is introduced by two essays designed to provide an overview of the case, providing insights into the origins of the dispute the Court was called upon to settle. The next four articles are testimony to breadth the opinion in this case, particularly dealing with aspects not often considered. Combined, they all demonstrate the lasting significance of what may be the most important free expression case the Court has delivered.