Home
Who Built the Moon?
Barnes and Noble
Who Built the Moon?
Current price: $13.99
Barnes and Noble
Who Built the Moon?
Current price: $13.99
Size: OS
Loading Inventory...
*Product information may vary - to confirm product availability, pricing, shipping and return information please contact Barnes and Noble
It's hard to blame
Noel Gallagher
for opting for stability over adventure once he disbanded
Oasis
. After spending nearly 20 years battling his brother
Liam
, he needed to take things easy, and if his solo records --
Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds
(2011) and
Chasing Yesterday
(2015) -- were a little too calm, consider it a consequence of navigating himself out of chaos. Despite achieving solo success,
Gallagher
seemed to have a nagging voice in the back of his head that he'd ceded the psychedelic ground he claimed at the height of Brit-pop. That voice began to beckon when he first launched his solo career, leading him to cut an album with trippy production team
Amorphous Androgynous
in 2011 but, unsatisfied with the results, he scrapped the project.
finally figured out how to reconnect with the part of him that sang with
Chemical Brothers
in 2017, when he teamed up with fellow '90s survivor producer/composer
David Holmes
for
Who Built the Moon?
Opening with the Technicolor pulse of "Fort Knox" -- a swirling near-instrumental that deliberately recalls "F***** in the Bushes" --
announces itself as a noisier, busier record than either of its predecessors but by the time the stomping "Holy Mountain" kicks in, it's clear that
and
Holmes
are engaging in a decidedly retro notion of the future, one that looks back to the '90s looking back at the '60s. This has been
Noel
's stock in trade since the start, but during
' heyday, he'd undercut his conservatism by making a great, bloody racket and writing melodies that sliced into the subconscious -- calling cards he neglected in his bid from maturation.
happily restores these elements to the equation, marrying it to his refined sense of songcraft.
may not precisely serve up surprises here --
adds some attractive, quirky flair on the margin, but he's working with sounds
endorsed in the first act of his career -- but there is a certain rush hearing him opt for glam, psychedelia, and candied pop instead of respectable strumming. Once that initial rush fades, the album is still satisfying due to its impeccable execution.
knows how to construct a sturdy song and
knows how to dress them up in flashy clothes, and the combination results in
's best album since splitting up
. ~ Stephen Thomas Erlewine
Noel Gallagher
for opting for stability over adventure once he disbanded
Oasis
. After spending nearly 20 years battling his brother
Liam
, he needed to take things easy, and if his solo records --
Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds
(2011) and
Chasing Yesterday
(2015) -- were a little too calm, consider it a consequence of navigating himself out of chaos. Despite achieving solo success,
Gallagher
seemed to have a nagging voice in the back of his head that he'd ceded the psychedelic ground he claimed at the height of Brit-pop. That voice began to beckon when he first launched his solo career, leading him to cut an album with trippy production team
Amorphous Androgynous
in 2011 but, unsatisfied with the results, he scrapped the project.
finally figured out how to reconnect with the part of him that sang with
Chemical Brothers
in 2017, when he teamed up with fellow '90s survivor producer/composer
David Holmes
for
Who Built the Moon?
Opening with the Technicolor pulse of "Fort Knox" -- a swirling near-instrumental that deliberately recalls "F***** in the Bushes" --
announces itself as a noisier, busier record than either of its predecessors but by the time the stomping "Holy Mountain" kicks in, it's clear that
and
Holmes
are engaging in a decidedly retro notion of the future, one that looks back to the '90s looking back at the '60s. This has been
Noel
's stock in trade since the start, but during
' heyday, he'd undercut his conservatism by making a great, bloody racket and writing melodies that sliced into the subconscious -- calling cards he neglected in his bid from maturation.
happily restores these elements to the equation, marrying it to his refined sense of songcraft.
may not precisely serve up surprises here --
adds some attractive, quirky flair on the margin, but he's working with sounds
endorsed in the first act of his career -- but there is a certain rush hearing him opt for glam, psychedelia, and candied pop instead of respectable strumming. Once that initial rush fades, the album is still satisfying due to its impeccable execution.
knows how to construct a sturdy song and
knows how to dress them up in flashy clothes, and the combination results in
's best album since splitting up
. ~ Stephen Thomas Erlewine