Home
Levinas, Kant and the Problematic of Temporality
Barnes and Noble
Levinas, Kant and the Problematic of Temporality
Current price: $89.99
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19bb5/19bb5adf3ef79a29fe37666a3c89f37111b8f121" alt="Levinas, Kant and the Problematic of Temporality"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19bb5/19bb5adf3ef79a29fe37666a3c89f37111b8f121" alt="Levinas, Kant and the Problematic of Temporality"
Barnes and Noble
Levinas, Kant and the Problematic of Temporality
Current price: $89.99
Size: Hardcover
Loading Inventory...
*Product information may vary - to confirm product availability, pricing, shipping and return information please contact Barnes and Noble
This book offers an ethical interpretation of the
Critique of Pure Reason
by establishing the historical connection between the problematic of Temporality in the philosophies of Heidegger and Levinas on the one hand, and the ground-laying of metaphysics in the schematism of Kant’s critical philosophy on the other. Drawing on Levinas’s ethical critique of the Heideggerian problematic of Temporality together with his destructive proposal to carry out the deformalization of the Kantian notion of time in a manner consistent with Rosenzweig’s philosophy, the book argues that this historical connection should be established at the point where Kant determines the ethical status of the schematism according to the regulative schemas of the ideas of pure reason, and not, as in Heidegger’s ontological destruction, at the point of his determination of the sensible schemas of the pure concepts of understanding alone.
Critique of Pure Reason
by establishing the historical connection between the problematic of Temporality in the philosophies of Heidegger and Levinas on the one hand, and the ground-laying of metaphysics in the schematism of Kant’s critical philosophy on the other. Drawing on Levinas’s ethical critique of the Heideggerian problematic of Temporality together with his destructive proposal to carry out the deformalization of the Kantian notion of time in a manner consistent with Rosenzweig’s philosophy, the book argues that this historical connection should be established at the point where Kant determines the ethical status of the schematism according to the regulative schemas of the ideas of pure reason, and not, as in Heidegger’s ontological destruction, at the point of his determination of the sensible schemas of the pure concepts of understanding alone.