Home
Modernist Parasites: Bioethics, Dependency, and Literature, Post-1900
Barnes and Noble
Modernist Parasites: Bioethics, Dependency, and Literature, Post-1900
Current price: $100.00
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ef51/3ef5196590e32730262f504f20e0758ab7605585" alt="Modernist Parasites: Bioethics, Dependency, and Literature, Post-1900"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ef51/3ef5196590e32730262f504f20e0758ab7605585" alt="Modernist Parasites: Bioethics, Dependency, and Literature, Post-1900"
Barnes and Noble
Modernist Parasites: Bioethics, Dependency, and Literature, Post-1900
Current price: $100.00
Size: Hardcover
Loading Inventory...
*Product information may vary - to confirm product availability, pricing, shipping and return information please contact Barnes and Noble
Modernist Parasites: Bioethics, Dependency, and Literature, Post-1900
analyzes biological and social parasites in the political, scientific, and literary imagination. With the rise of Darwinism, eugenics, and parasitology in the late nineteenth century, Sebastian Williams posits that the “parasite” came to be humanity’s ultimate other—a dangerous antagonist. But many authors such as Isaac Rosenberg, John Steinbeck, Franz Kafka, Clarice Lispector, Nella Larsen, and George Orwell reconsider parasitism. Ultimately, parasites inherently depend on others for their survival, illustrating the limits of ethical models that privilege the discrete individual above interdependent communities.
analyzes biological and social parasites in the political, scientific, and literary imagination. With the rise of Darwinism, eugenics, and parasitology in the late nineteenth century, Sebastian Williams posits that the “parasite” came to be humanity’s ultimate other—a dangerous antagonist. But many authors such as Isaac Rosenberg, John Steinbeck, Franz Kafka, Clarice Lispector, Nella Larsen, and George Orwell reconsider parasitism. Ultimately, parasites inherently depend on others for their survival, illustrating the limits of ethical models that privilege the discrete individual above interdependent communities.