Home
The Longevity Argument: The Doomsday Argument is wrong, and logical induction has a philosophical basis.
Barnes and Noble
The Longevity Argument: The Doomsday Argument is wrong, and logical induction has a philosophical basis.
Current price: $9.00
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/132c2/132c276c385deff20f6319100b0007c8e3edd680" alt="The Longevity Argument: The Doomsday Argument is wrong, and logical induction has a philosophical basis."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/132c2/132c276c385deff20f6319100b0007c8e3edd680" alt="The Longevity Argument: The Doomsday Argument is wrong, and logical induction has a philosophical basis."
Barnes and Noble
The Longevity Argument: The Doomsday Argument is wrong, and logical induction has a philosophical basis.
Current price: $9.00
Size: OS
Loading Inventory...
*Product information may vary - to confirm product availability, pricing, shipping and return information please contact Barnes and Noble
The Doomsday Argument, Self-Sampling Assumption, and Self-Indication Assumption are wrong; J. Richard Gott III's delta
t
argument underestimates longevity, providing lower bounds on probabilities of longevity, and is equivalent to Laplace's Rule of Succession; but Non-Parametric Predictive Inference based on the work of Bruce M. Hill and Frank P.A. Coolen is consistent with a plausible theory of induction; and Ayn Rand's identification of characteristics as ranges of measurement establishes a philosophical foundation for such a theory of induction.This monograph is a much-revised and much-expanded version of the author's article, "Past Longevity as Evidence for the Future," published in
Philosophy of Science
(January 2009), often recognized as the leading peer-reviewed journal in its field. Since its publication, that article has been cited favorably in these top-ranked philosophical journals:
Journal of Philosophy
,
Analysis
Synthese
, and
Ratio
.
t
argument underestimates longevity, providing lower bounds on probabilities of longevity, and is equivalent to Laplace's Rule of Succession; but Non-Parametric Predictive Inference based on the work of Bruce M. Hill and Frank P.A. Coolen is consistent with a plausible theory of induction; and Ayn Rand's identification of characteristics as ranges of measurement establishes a philosophical foundation for such a theory of induction.This monograph is a much-revised and much-expanded version of the author's article, "Past Longevity as Evidence for the Future," published in
Philosophy of Science
(January 2009), often recognized as the leading peer-reviewed journal in its field. Since its publication, that article has been cited favorably in these top-ranked philosophical journals:
Journal of Philosophy
,
Analysis
Synthese
, and
Ratio
.