Part 1 develops the thesis that humanity has experienced periods of female-centric social organization in its evolution that were egalitarian and harmonious in nature. The book uses the term ‘eutopian,’ from the Greek meaning “a good place” , to describe it’s essence. Part 2 describes the evolutionary processes involved in the overthrow of this female-centric paradigm by a male-centric paradigm of social organization. The term “dystopian,” from the Greek meaning “a bad place” , is used to describe it’s essence. Part 3 develops the thesis that the violence of White Man’s birth and growth in Western Europe were but a rehearsal for the aggressions he would commit in the pursuit of achieving global domination. The thesis of Part 4 is that the exponential growth of the White Man’s male-centric paradigm has turned cancerous and cannibalistic on itself, thereby threatening the continued existence of the species as a whole. Part 5 concludes that as a species we are at an inflection point. We must at all costs mitigate the immanent dystopian collapse of the White Man’s global paradigm by charting a course to recover the simple eutopian balance of the female-centric paradigm.